World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Absence of Malice

Absence of Malice
Absence of Malice promotional movie poster
Directed by Sydney Pollack
Produced by Sydney Pollack
Ronald L. Schwary
Written by Kurt Luedtke
David Rayfiel (uncredited)
Music by Dave Grusin
Cinematography Owen Roizman
Edited by Sheldon Kahn
Distributed by Columbia Pictures
Release dates
  • December 18, 1981 (1981-12-18)
Running time
116 minutes
Country United States
Language English
Box office $40,716,963

Absence of Malice is a 1981 American drama film starring Paul Newman, Sally Field, and Bob Balaban, directed by Sydney Pollack.

The title refers to the legal definition of one of the requirements of proof against libel defamation, and is used in journalism classes to illustrate the conflict between disclosing damaging personal information and the public's right to know.[1]


  • Plot 1
  • Cast 2
  • Production 3
  • Reception 4
    • Critical response 4.1
    • Awards 4.2
  • References 5
  • External links 6


Miami liquor wholesaler Michael Gallagher (Newman), who is the son of a deceased criminal, awakes one day to find himself a front-page story in the local newspaper, indicating that he is being investigated in the disappearance and presumed murder of a local longshoreman union official, Joey Diaz.

The story was written by Miami Standard newspaper reporter Megan Carter (Field), who reads it from a file, left intentionally on the desktop of federal prosecutor Elliot Rosen (Balaban). As it turns out, Rosen is trying to squeeze Gallagher for information.

Gallagher comes to the newspaper's office trying to discover the basis for the story, but Carter does not reveal her source.

Gallagher's business is shut down by union officials who are now suspicious of him, since he has been implicated in Diaz's murder. Local crime boss Malderone, Gallagher's uncle, has him followed, just in case he talks to the government.

Teresa Peron (Melinda Dillon), a lifelong friend of Gallagher, tells the reporter that Gallagher couldn't have killed Diaz because he was taking her out of town for an abortion on that weekend. A devout Catholic, she doesn't want Carter to reveal this publicly, but Carter prints the story anyway. When the paper comes out the next morning, Peron is so ashamed that she steals newspapers from the yards of her neighbors. Later, offscreen, she commits suicide.

The paper's editor McAdam tells Carter that Peron has committed suicide. Carter goes to Gallagher to apologize, but an enraged Gallagher assaults her. Nevertheless, she attempts to make it up to him by revealing Rosen's role in the investigation.

Gallagher hatches a plan for revenge. He arranges a secret meeting with District Attorney Quinn, offering to use his organized-crime contacts to give Quinn exclusive information on Diaz's murder, in exchange for the D.A. calling off the investigation and issuing a public statement clearing him. Both before his meeting with Quinn and after Quinn's public statement, Gallagher makes significant anonymous contributions to one of Quinn's political action committee backers. Gallagher, thankful for Carter's help, also begins a love affair with her.

Rosen is mystified by Quinn's exoneration of Gallagher, so he places phone taps on both and begins a surveillance of their movements. He and federal agent Bob Waddell obtain evidence of Gallagher's donations to Quinn's political committee. They also find out about Gallagher and Carter's relationship.

Waddell, as a friend, warns Carter about the investigation to keep her out of trouble, but she breaks the story that the office of the district attorney (D.A.) is investigating Gallagher's attempt to bribe the D.A.

The story makes the front page again and causes a huge uproar because of the rules everyone except Gallagher have broken in the investigation. The US Assistant Attorney General Wells (Wilford Brimley) ultimately calls all of the principals together. He discovers that Rosen turned the investigation against Gallagher into a bogus investigation with the purpose of illegally leaking it to the press in order to squeeze him for information and fires him, implicitly telling him he is going to be charged for what he did and also suggests that Quinn resign. (Gallagher's donations to Quinn's political committee, though not illegal, cast suspicions on Quinn's motives in issuing his statement clearing Gallagher.) Wells intimates that he suspects that Gallagher set Quinn and Rosen up, but cannot prove it, so he will not investigate further. The newspaper prints a story (not written by Carter) revealing the entire truth about the incidents. It is unclear whether Carter keeps her job, or whether Carter's relationship with Gallagher will continue, but the final scene shows them having a friendly conversation on the wharf where Gallagher's boat is docked.



The movie was written by Kurt Luedtke, a former newspaper editor, and David Rayfiel (uncredited).[2] Newman stated that the film was a "direct attack on the New York Post", which had earlier published a caption for a photo of Newman that he stated was inaccurate. Because of the dispute the Post banned him from its pages, even removing his name from movies in the TV listings.[3]


Critical response

Absence of Malice received mostly positive reviews. Rotten Tomatoes gives the film a score of 86% based on reviews from 22 critics, with an average score of 6.6/10.[4] Newman and Dillon's performances were praised, as was Brimley's cameo. Many reviewers compared the film to the 1976 Academy Award-winner All the President's Men.

In his review, Time magazine's Richard Schickel wrote, "Absence of Malice does not invalidate All the President's Men. But with entertainment values – and a moral sense — every bit as high as that film's, it observes that there is an underside to journalistic gallantry."[5] Similarly, Variety called it "a splendidly disturbing look at the power of sloppy reporting to inflict harm on the innocent."[6]

The Chicago Sun-Times' Roger Ebert wrote that some may take the approach "that no respectable journalist would ever do the things that Sally Field does about, to, and with Paul Newman in this movie. She is a disgrace to her profession." Instead he preferred a "romantic" approach, writing that he "liked this movie despite its factual and ethical problems" and wasn't "even so sure they matter so much to most viewers."[7] Janet Maslin of the New York Times found the movie lacking in momentum, but praised its "quiet gravity."[8] Dave Kehr of the Chicago Reader disliked Absence of Malice, writing that "the picture has a smug, demoralizing sense of pervasive corruption."[9]


Absence of Malice was nominated for three Academy Awards; Best Actor in a Leading Role (Newman), Best Actress in a Supporting Role (Dillon) and Best Writing, Screenplay Written Directly for the Screen. At the 32nd Berlin International Film Festival the film won an Honourable Mention.[10]


  1. ^ Absence of Malice (1981) When bad journalism kills, By Lauren Kirchner, Columbia Journalism Review, July 15, 2011
  2. ^ (1981),"Absence of Malice" Internet Movie Database. Accessed March 20, 2012.
  3. ^
  4. ^
  5. ^ Schickel, Richard. "Cinema: Lethal Leaks," Time magazine (November 23, 1981).
  6. ^ Variety Staff. ",Absence of Malice Variety (December 31, 1980).
  7. ^ Ebert, Roger. "Absence of Malice," Chicago Sun-Times (January 1, 1981).
  8. ^ Maslin, Janet. "MOVIE REVIEW: NYT Critics' Pick: Absence of Malice", New York Times (November 19, 1981)
  9. ^ Kehr, Dave. "Absence of Malice," Chicago Reader. Accessed March 20, 2012.
  10. ^

External links

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from School eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.